The Athletic UK's lead correspondent David Ornstein answered questions from supporters.
It's rare for senior executives to be sacked before the manager, but could you see Jason Wilcox or Omar Berrada leaving Manchester United? — Joshua B.
Ornstein: The hierarchy has seen turnover since Sir Jim Ratcliffe assumed sporting control in 2024—most notably Dan Ashworth’s arrival and subsequent departure. Christopher Vivell joined initially on a short-term basis before becoming permanent head of recruitment, and while internet rumors persist, his exact contractual situation remains unclear.
This brings us back to the example of Brentford, whose sustained progress stems from continuity, unity, and a clear long-term identity. I believe Manchester United intend to pursue a similar approach by backing Berrada and Wilcox, even though immense scrutiny is inevitable at Old Trafford.
Given their turbulent history and past missteps, constantly changing personnel is seldom prudent unless fundamental flaws emerge. Frequent upheaval brings conflicting philosophies and values, ultimately forcing ownership to question their initial appointments. This encompasses Ratcliffe’s sporting regime as well as the Glazers, who remain deeply involved. While poor results mean changes can never be entirely ruled out, the external fixation on whether Michael Carrick will be replaced is striking.
Managers are traditionally the easiest casualties, and Carrick undoubtedly feels the pressure. Yet it makes little sense to believe perpetual managerial turnover will improve circumstances. Manchester United must unlock the potential of a squad built with substantial investment, rather than fixating on immediate additions like a new left-back. Truly successful clubs share common traits: superior coaching, executive alignment, resilience, and the stability necessary to foster genuine progress.
While football remains unpredictable, I have heard nothing to suggest any imminent departures at either executive or managerial level.
